Category guide

    How We Name Harm

    People excuse harm every day. Sometimes loudly. Sometimes politely. Sometimes with a smile and a receipt.

    This site exists to name it anyway.

    These categories aren't meant to sound scholarly. They're meant to be clear. Each one is a lens for recognizing how harm happens, how it spreads, and how people justify it.

    A single story can fit more than one category. When that happens, I use the category that best captures the core harm.

    Jump to a category
    01

    Abuse of Power

    What it means

    When someone with authority, influence, or control uses it to exploit, punish, silence, or intimidate others.

    What it includes

    • Retaliation against critics or whistleblowers
    • Coercion, intimidation, threats
    • Weaponizing rules to target people
    • Using "the system" as a bat

    What it's not

    • Someone being strict but fair
    • Normal enforcement of rules without targeting or cruelty

    Fictional examples

    • A manager threatens to fire workers who report safety violations.
    • A local official blocks permits for anyone who supports an opponent.
    Back to top ↑
    02

    Corporate Greed

    What it means

    When profit becomes the excuse to harm people, mislead them, trap them, or squeeze them.

    What it includes

    • Cutting corners that endanger others
    • Predatory pricing, deceptive fees, "gotcha" contracts
    • Exploiting workers while claiming it's unavoidable
    • Treating people like numbers, not lives

    What it's not

    • A business making a profit ethically
    • Normal pricing decisions that don't rely on deception or harm

    Fictional examples

    • A company hides known health risks because a recall would cost too much.
    • A service advertises "$9.99" but the real monthly cost is triple after mandatory fees.
    Back to top ↑
    03

    Environmental Harm

    What it means

    When damage to the environment is treated as acceptable collateral — especially when the harm is long-term, preventable, or deliberately ignored.

    What it includes

    • Pollution, dumping, poisoning water and air
    • Greenwashing (pretending to be "eco" while doing the opposite)
    • Destroying ecosystems for convenience or profit
    • Shifting consequences onto communities and future generations

    What it's not

    • Honest accidents paired with responsibility and repair
    • Unavoidable impact where harm is minimized and disclosed

    Fictional examples

    • A factory dumps waste at night because it's cheaper than proper disposal.
    • A brand sells "green" products while its supply chain quietly destroys habitats.
    Back to top ↑
    04

    Human Rights Violations

    What it means

    When people are treated as less than human. When dignity becomes optional. When suffering is considered acceptable.

    What it includes

    • Forced labor, trafficking, abuse
    • Targeting groups through discrimination or violence
    • Denying basic safety, healthcare, housing, or fair process
    • Policies or practices that knowingly produce cruelty

    What it's not

    • Disagreement or discomfort
    • Consequences that are proportional, lawful, and humane

    Fictional examples

    • A detention facility denies medical care to punish people into compliance.
    • A group is stripped of legal protections "temporarily" until it becomes permanent.
    Back to top ↑
    05

    Information and Narrative Control

    What it means

    When truth is managed. When the public is pushed toward a preferred story through distortion, omission, intimidation, or manufactured doubt.

    What it includes

    • Controlling what information is allowed to spread
    • Strategic half-truths and selective evidence
    • "Flooding the zone" with noise so nothing can be trusted
    • Punishing people for speaking plainly

    How it differs from "lying"

    A lie is a single weapon. Narrative control is an entire battlefield. It's not just falsehood — it's shaping what people think is real, what they notice, and what they're allowed to question.

    Does fake news fit here?

    Yes, when it's part of a pattern: repeated distortion designed to steer belief, protect power, or manufacture outrage.

    What it's not

    • Honest bias or perspective
    • Reporting mistakes corrected in good faith

    Fictional examples

    • A government releases selective "evidence" while suppressing anything that contradicts it.
    • A media outlet repeatedly frames victims as villains until the public stops caring.
    Back to top ↑
    06

    Chosen Indifference

    What it means

    When harm is visible, known, and avoidable… and people choose not to act because it's easier not to.

    What it includes

    • "Not my problem" while benefiting from the harm
    • Bystanders with power staying silent
    • Institutions watching harm happen and doing nothing
    • Comfort being valued over conscience

    What it's not

    • People with no meaningful ability to change a situation
    • Mistakes made without awareness

    Fictional examples

    • An organization knows abuse is happening and keeps quiet to protect its reputation.
    • A community shrugs off cruelty because "that's just how things are."
    Back to top ↑
    07

    Corruption by Design

    What it means

    When harm isn't an accident — it's baked in. When the system is built to produce a certain outcome, and that outcome benefits someone.

    What it includes

    • Rules structured to protect wrongdoing
    • "Legal" structures that make accountability impossible
    • Incentives that reward cruelty or exploitation
    • Long-running patterns that don't get fixed because they're useful

    What it's not

    • A broken system that people are actively trying to repair
    • Inefficiency without intent or benefit

    Fictional examples

    • A process is designed so complaints are "reviewed" forever but never resolved.
    • A policy creates suffering that conveniently discourages people from seeking help.
    Back to top ↑

    A final note

    These categories are here so readers can follow the logic, not just the emotion.

    If you disagree with a label, good. That means you're thinking. But don't stop at the label. Ask the harder question:

    • Who benefited?
    • Who paid the cost?
    • What was ignored?
    • What was justified?

    That's the point.